Tuesday, October 19, 2010

Promoting From Within

I've always had trouble with Steve Carrell's character Michael Scott. He seemed too stupid and annoying to carry a show.  Nevertheless, The Office has been NBC's most successful comedy for several years now.

Carrell is moving on after this season--a recent episode had him saying goodbye to all his girlfriends.  So the question is who will replace him.  I think it's clear they need to go in a different direction to keep the show (relatively) fresh.

Actor/writer B. J. Novak suggested they bring in Danny McBride.  Even if McBride were willing, would his blustery style work?  In general, some big names have been thrown around, but I wonder if they won't throw off the show's balance (assuming that's a bad thing).

The show has brought in new characters before, but maybe they should try to keep this in the family--it's a tricky transition, and comedy audiences tend to like continuity.  So who of the regulars could become the new leader?

Dwight:  Too quirky and nasty.  His short moments in power have led to disaster.  They'd have to lose what makes his character tick to put him in charge.

Jim:  Too normal.  They've already tried giving him power, and it's not interesting to have a rational, intelligent person lead things.

Pam:  Might be interesting.  Would set up a possible conflict between Pam and Jim which could revivify their relationship.  But Pam, like Jim, suffers from the problem of being in on the joke.

Ryan:  He's been in charge before (though considering how he fell out of power I've never bought that the company brought him back).  But he's too much on the sidelines to take over.  It might have worked at one time to give a former temp power, but he's been around too long.

Darryl:  Another possibility, but, even when he worked in the loading dock, he was too much in control.  You want someone in charge who's not ready for the position.

Toby:  Maybe, but too quiet a character to rise to the position.

Gabe:  Coming from Sabre, it makes sense he'd be in charge, but his character is too minor to suddenly take over.

Andy:  This makes the most sense.  He's never been quite sure of his place (and this would certainly create another roadblock in his pursuit of Kelly).  The episode where Michael visited his old girlfriends also featured Andy trying to run a seminar on STDs, a very Michael-like activity.  With Ed Helms becoming a bit of a star due to The Hangover, it looks like they may be grooming him for the lead.

All the other characters seem too minor or one-note to be promoted.

3 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well I always thought the great thing about Michael Scott was that it played up against the the common assumption you need to be a genius or even a competent manager to succeed in business (especially sales.

I've been a big fan of the office but thinks its best days are behind it- there are still some good chuckles and jokes but they seem to be trying too hard this year. Its too over the top. The crazy world of Dunder Mifflin was helped by the thin veneer of normality and flatness of the documentary style (which I like though I'm glad they've mainly stopped pretending there's actually a documentary being made). This year they are really playing up the weirdness beyond a comfortable level. They've used up all of the normal grown up characters (early Jan, David Wallace, early Ryan) except maybe Oscar. I have heard HR consultants say that in the workplace you will run into all the Office-type characters except Dwight. This year, there seem to be several Dwights.

Maybe a new face will help but a year without Michael Scott is going to be reminiscent of "Archie Bunker's Place" or maybe the fine but not great post-Diane & Coach years at Cheers.

8:28 AM, October 19, 2010  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

They're probably glad to hear that since there were most post-Diane years on Cheers than Diane years.

8:46 AM, October 19, 2010  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well I never stated that post-Diane Cheers was not a commercially viable enterprise. I said it wasn't anything more

12:36 PM, October 20, 2010  

Post a Comment

<< Home

web page hit counter